On 09/19/2012 01:42 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
> Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle '*pos == 0'
> specially.
>
> About the comments:
> /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
> A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been done, and it
> works well.
Could I get some comments on this patch?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> This patch will remove that useless branch to clean the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 5 +----
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> index 8022c66..fbd8955 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> @@ -140,10 +140,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>
> static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> {
> - if (*pos == 0) /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
> - *pos = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> - else
> - *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
> + *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
> if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
> return &cpu_data(*pos);
> return NULL;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
