In article <01022100361408.18944@gimli> you wrote: > But actually, rm is not problem, it's open and create. To do a > create you have to make sure the file doesn't already exist, and > without an index you have to scan on average half the directory file. Unless you use a File System which is better for that, like Reiser-FS. Of course a even better solution is to distribute those files in hashed subdirs. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for ... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index ... Mike Dresser
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory in... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directo... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directo... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory in... Alan Cox
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directo... Ed Tomlinson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time... Ed Tomlinson