> probably a bad idea to use it, because in theory at least the VFS layer > might decide to switch the hash function around. I'm more interested in > hearing whether it's a good hash, and maybe we could improve the VFS hash > enough that there's no reason to use anything else.. Reiserfs seems to have done a lot of work on this and be using tea, which is also nice as tea is non trivial to abuse as a user to create pessimal file searches intentionally - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Jeremy Jackson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for ... Mike Dresser
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index ... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory in... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory in... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directo... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index ... Alan Cox
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory in... Ed Tomlinson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directo... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time dir... Ed Tomlinson
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index ... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory in... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directo... Chris Mason