On Fre, 2012-09-14 at 16:25 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2012-09-14 15:46, Jim Rees wrote:
> >Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >A pure K&R-C version would use a string:
> > >#define base10len(i)
> > "\0x1\0x3\0x5\0x8\0x0A\0x0D\0x0F\0x11\0x14"[sizeof(i)]
> > >(if I converted them properly into hexadecimal)
> > The syntax is \x01\x03\x05...
> >
> >K&R doesn't have the \x escape, only \0 (octal).
We cuold use octal too.
> People recommend K&R only for the introductory reading, not for its
> actuality.
And I actually used it to show that no gcc-isms are necessary. ANSI-C is
fine too for that case.
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : be...@petrovitsch.priv.at
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
