On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:33 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > nohz_balance_enter_idle is good a name too. but I name it as
> > set_nohz_tick_stopped, since there is a clear_nohz_tick_stopped(), that
> > just do the opposed action of this function. According to this, is it
> > better to another function to nohz_balance_leave_idle()?
> > Or keep their current name?
> >
>
> Yes that will be more appropriate name.
I've made it:
nohz_balance_{enter,exit}_idle()
Most of the nohz stuff has the {enter,exit}.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
