Em Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:24:33AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi, Arnaldo
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:52:53 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> >
> > Just use pr_err() + return -1 and let the other tests run as well and
> > then the perf's main() exit doing whatever it needs.
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/builtin-test.c
> > index cf33e50..6ae102e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-test.c
> > @@ -1023,14 +1023,16 @@ static int __test__rdpmc(void)
> >
> > fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> > if (fd < 0) {
> > - die("Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned "
> > - "with %d (%s)\n", fd, strerror(errno));
> > + pr_debug("Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned "
> > + "with %d (%s)\n", fd, strerror(errno));
>
> s/pr_debug/pr_err/ ?
>
> Otherwise the message will not be shown unless -v option is given
> - and it's not sync with the changelog ;-)
Oops :-\ Can you sent a fixup patch for this and the other case?
Thanks for the review!
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
