Hello, Lai. On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 01:27:37AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > The patch set is based on 3b07e9ca26866697616097044f25fbe53dbab693 of wq.git > > > > Patch 1,2 are accepted. Patch 1 goes to 3.6. tj has a replacement goes > > to 3.6 instead of Patch 2. so Patch2 will go to 3.7. Patch2 will need > > to be rebased if the replacement is still in 3.7. > > (tj, could you help me do the rebase if I don't need to respin the patchset > > as V7 ?) > > > > Patch3,4 fix depletion problem, it is simple enough. it goes to 3.6. > > sorry. > 3.6 is synchronous idles when we use tj's replacement for patch2. > and maybe_rebind_manager() don't wait for idles rebind. so it can't go to 3.6.
Let's get the fix down first. I *think* we can do it for 3.6-fixes. Can't we do the following? * Instead of MANAGING, add pool->manager. * Fix the idle depletion bug by using pool->manager for exclusion and always grabbing pool->manager_mutex. Hotplug can use pool->manager to schedule rebind work (or UNBIND) to the manager. Thoughts? Also, can you please base the fix patches on top of wq/for-3.6-fixes? It's getting quite confusing. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-3.6-fixes Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
