>>> On 07.09.12 at 17:47, Stefan Bader <stefan.ba...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 07.09.2012 17:44, Jan Beulich wrote: >> All of this still doesn't provide evidence that a plain upstream >> kernel is actually having any problems in the first place. Further, >> if you say EC2 has a crippled hypervisor patch - is that patch >> available for looking at somewhere? > > It was not a hypervisor patch. It was one for the guest. This was the hack:
So then why do you want to patch the upstream kernel? It won't make that hack go away, nor will it help any existing kernels. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
