> -----Original Message----- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@linuxdriverproject.org] On Behalf Of KY > Srinivasan > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:29 PM > To: Greg KH > Cc: o...@aepfle.de; tho...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > d...@redhat.com; a...@canonical.com; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; > b...@decadent.org.uk > Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 05/10] Tools: hv: Add an example script to retrieve > dhcp > state > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:04 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: o...@aepfle.de; tho...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > d...@redhat.com; a...@canonical.com; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; > > b...@decadent.org.uk > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/10] Tools: hv: Add an example script to retrieve > > dhcp > > state > > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:39:12PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 6:59 PM > > > > To: KY Srinivasan > > > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; > > o...@aepfle.de; > > > > a...@canonical.com; b...@decadent.org.uk; tho...@redhat.com; > > > > d...@redhat.com > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/10] Tools: hv: Add an example script to > > > > retrieve > > dhcp > > > > state > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 02:46:37PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > To keep the KVP daemon code free of distro specific details, we > > > > > invoke an > > > > > external script to retrieve the DHCP state. This is an example script > > > > > that > > > > > was used to test the KVP code. This script has to be implemented in a > Distro > > > > > specific fashion. For instance on distros that ship with Network > > > > > Manager > > > > enabled, > > > > > this script can be based on NM APIs. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > tools/hv/hv_get_dhcp_info.sh | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > create mode 100755 tools/hv/hv_get_dhcp_info.sh > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/hv/hv_get_dhcp_info.sh > b/tools/hv/hv_get_dhcp_info.sh > > > > > new file mode 100755 > > > > > index 0000000..3de4587 > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > +++ b/tools/hv/hv_get_dhcp_info.sh > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > > > > > +#!/bin/bash > > > > > + > > > > > +# This example script retrieves the DHCP state of a given interface. > > > > > +# In the interest of keeping the KVP daemon code free of distro > > > > > specific > > > > > +# information; the kvp daemon code invokes this external script to > gather > > > > > +# DHCP setting for the specific interface. > > > > > +# > > > > > +# Input: Name of the interface > > > > > +# > > > > > +# Output: The script prints the string "Enabled" to stdout to > > > > > indicate > > > > > +# that DHCP is enabled on the interface. > > > > > > > > What happens if DHCP is not enabled on the interface? Shouldn't that > > > > also return something other than "success"? > > > > > > The script is expected to write "Enabled" to stdout to indicate if DHCP is > > enabled; if this > > > is not the case, implicitly we assume DHCP is not enabled (since this is > > > a binary > > state). > > > > It's not really "binary" given that you are expecting "Enabled" or > > nothing, right? "Disabled" would make a bit more sense perhaps? > > In the KVP daemon code, I currently only check for "Enabled" to see if > DHCP is enabled. > > > > > Having a script return "nothing at all" to show the failure of a state > > doesn't seem the wisest thing, does it? > > I can certainly resubmit this patch with the change you are suggesting. This > patch > adds a new file > and does not impact any of the other patches that follows this. Would you want > me to resubmit all of the > remaining patches starting with this one.
I have resent this patch with the change you have suggested. Since this patch is a standalone patch I have not resent the other patches that follow this patch. Let me know if you want me to resend the remaining patches. Regards, K. Y > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@linuxdriverproject.org > http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
