On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL > > <stany.mar...@novasys-ingenierie.com> wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.mar...@novasys-ingenierie.com> > >> --- > >> > >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel > >> 2.6.25. > >> > >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head > >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy > >> > >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +- > >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go > > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there. > > > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > > > Geert > > > > Hello Geert, > > Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ?
Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log. AFAIK the phy interface is standardized. Philippe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/