On 08/22/2012 03:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> 08/22/12 5:24 AM >>> >> On 08/20/2012 10:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> I was thought you have 'Agreed' for xen part code. :) > > I had agreed to it being done the right way, and I had pointed out the > problem once. I can't say for sure that I looked at the most recent rev > closely enough to spot the issue still being unfixed. > >>> For one, while TLB_FLUSH_ALL gets passed as 'end' argument to >>> flush_tlb_others(), the Xen code was made to check its 'start' >>> parameter. >> >> Do you mean need the following change? --untested. > > Yes. I'd question though whether for that special case it shouldn't be > start _and_ end to get passed the special value.
Actually the special value is already there in old code. so, what's your meaning of the question? > > Jan > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
