Since we have already in BH context when iscsi_sw_tcp_write_space()
is called, it's unnecessary to disable BH.

Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
index 9220861..d763857 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void iscsi_sw_tcp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
        struct iscsi_sw_tcp_conn *tcp_sw_conn;
        void (*old_write_space)(struct sock *);
 
-       read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+       read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
        conn = sk->sk_user_data;
        if (!conn) {
                read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void iscsi_sw_tcp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
        tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
        tcp_sw_conn = tcp_conn->dd_data;
        old_write_space = tcp_sw_conn->old_write_space;
-       read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+       read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
 
        old_write_space(sk);
 
-- 
1.7.11

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to