On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:52:03 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Currently the gtk_main_quit() is called twice when perf exits so the
>> following warning is emitted:
>>
>>   [penberg@tux perf]$ ./perf report --gtk
>>   ^Cperf: Interrupt
>>
>>   (perf:4048): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_main_quit: assertion `main_loops != 
>> NULL' failed
>>
>> Fix it by not to call it unnecessarily.
>>
>> Reported-by: Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/ui/gtk/setup.c |    2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/gtk/setup.c b/tools/perf/ui/gtk/setup.c
>> index ad40b3626fdb..ec1ee26b485a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/ui/gtk/setup.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/gtk/setup.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ int perf_gtk__init(void)
>>
>>  void perf_gtk__exit(bool wait_for_ok __used)
>>  {
>> +       if (!perf_gtk__is_active_context(pgctx))
>> +               return;
>>         perf_error__unregister(&perf_gtk_eops);
>>         gtk_main_quit();
>>  }
>
> Wouldn't it be nicer to rearrange the callers so that perf_gtk__exit()
> is not called twice?

You mean this?


diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/setup.c b/tools/perf/ui/setup.c
index c7820e569660..d25e145e9a89 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/setup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/setup.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 #include "../cache.h"
 #include "../debug.h"
+#include "gtk/gtk.h"
 
 
 pthread_mutex_t ui__lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
@@ -37,7 +38,8 @@ void exit_browser(bool wait_for_ok)
 {
        switch (use_browser) {
        case 2:
-               perf_gtk__exit(wait_for_ok);
+               if (perf_gtk__is_active_context(pgctx))
+                       perf_gtk__exit(wait_for_ok);
                break;
 
        case 1:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to