On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:57:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 08/09/2012 03:34 PM, Betty Dall wrote: > > > > I thought this should be a break instead of a continue since the code > > does a break if the class is 0xffffffff. If the function does not have a > > valid VENDOR_ID, then the remaining function numbers do not have to be > > scanned because functions are required to be implemented in order (no > > skipping a function number.) > > > > Is that true? This is certainly not true in PCI in general: there is > required to be a function 0, but there is no guarantee that functions > 1-7 don't have gaps.
These scans are for special known devices, presumably true for them. Anwyays if you don't like it please use v1 of the patch. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
