On 08/04/2012 12:23 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:20:02AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On 08/03/2012 11:48 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> I forgot to comment on that one, sorry. >>>> >>>> If we put hash entries after struct hash_table we don't take the >>>> bits field size into account, or did I miss something? >>> >>> So, if you do the following, >>> >>> struct { >>> struct { >>> int i; >>> long ar[]; >>> } B; >>> long __ar_storage[32]; >>> } A; >> >> struct A should have been an union, right? > > I actually meant an enclosing struct. When you're defining a struct > member, simply putting the storage after a struct with var array > should be good enough. If that doesn't work, quite a few things in > the kernel will break.
Ah, I see, I've missed that part. Thanks! > Thanks. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/