On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 17:58 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2012-08-03 17:06, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> >>>+static inline unsigned char fat_tolower(unsigned char c)
> >>>+{
> >>>+ return ((c >= 'A') && (c <= 'Z')) ? c+32 : c;
> >>>+}
> >>>+
> >>
> >> The kernel already has a tolower() function, can that not be used?
> >
> >tolower() is not exactly same, right? e.g. tolower(0xc0). Otherwise,
> >tolower() is fine.
>
> Yes, but you can still
>
> return (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') ? tolower(c) : c;
But now it's less efficient because tolower() does an unnecessary lookup
to see if it's supposed to change the value. _tolower() wouldn't have
that issue, but it's marked "Do not use in your code".
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
