On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, David Weinehall wrote:
> >
> > Well, after all, it's debugging code, and the code now is easy to read.
> > Your code, while more efficient, isn't. I think that clarity takes
> > priority over efficiency in non-critical code such as debugging
> > code. Of course, this is my personal opinion...
>
> I agree my version isn't _as_ easy, and if this code only got built
> into DEBUG kernels, I would never have bothered about it; but it's
> built into every kernel, on executed paths, so it's no less critical.
Since it's DEBUG code only and nicely "hidden" in a .h file,
why not have the efficient code with a well-written comment
documenting what the code does and why it is there ?
regards,
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
