On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, David Weinehall wrote: > > Well, after all, it's debugging code, and the code now is easy to read. > Your code, while more efficient, isn't. I think that clarity takes > priority over efficiency in non-critical code such as debugging > code. Of course, this is my personal opinion... I agree my version isn't _as_ easy, and if this code only got built into DEBUG kernels, I would never have bothered about it; but it's built into every kernel, on executed paths, so it's no less critical. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE Hugh Dickins
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE Hugh Dickins
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE Kai Germaschewski
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE Hugh Dickins
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD... David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG... Hugh Dickins
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt D... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG... Stephen Wille Padnos
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt D... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt D... Stephen Wille Padnos
- Re: [PATCH] micro-opt D... Richard B. Johnson