On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On 01/08/12 14:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> Looks like you're adding the same call to each of the three cases:
> >>> mop500, snowball and hrefv60+. How about moving it before or after
> >>> the if/elseif block?
> >>
> >> The Snowball one is different 'mop500_msp_init' -> 'mop500_of_msp_init'.
> >
> > Ah, I see. Is there a problem in always using mop500_of_msp_init then?
> > I would guess that this just means you'd have to put the msp into the
> > device tree files, which don't yet exist for mop500 and hrefv60.
>
> Although that is true, it's only part of the issue.
>
> mop500_of_msp_init is only a temporary solution to aid in step-by-step
> enablement of DT for audio. By the end of the patch-set it has been
> removed (along with the call to it if 'of_machine_is_compatible
> ("calaosystems,snowball-a9500")'. What I can do it write a patch to
> consolidate the calls after "ARM: ux500: Remove platform registration
> of MSP devices", as a bolt-on.
I see. Your solution looks fine then.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
