On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 12:07 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Not only does bool describe it better, it should also allow gcc to > optimize it better as well. Unless Peter has a legitimate rational why > using bool in struct is bad, I would keep it as is.
I don't mind too much, but like said, I hate using types without specified storage, you never really know what the compiler will end up doing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
