On 07/21/2012 12:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 17:03 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: >> This patch set provide a way for user to dynamically configure the scheduler >> domain flags, which usually to be static. > > NAK.. you don't get to expose all this nonsense in a 'stable' ABI. > > You shouldn't need to prod at them to begin with.
So is that means expose those domain flags to user is a bad idea at all? Is this caused by that people don't need such feature or this feature has do harm to kernel's stability?(it could be not...) Regards, Michael Wang > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
