On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:02 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > The reporting tool(Abrt) complicated the reporting and kerneloops.org > > DNS still doesn't associated with the required ip address. ( Arjan? ) > Anton - just talk to the kernel.org maintainers and get oops.kernel.org > set up somewhere and be done with it.
I like the idea of oops.kernel.org name. I will speak to the folks. I wanted old dns in order to get(possibly) the reports from the clients that have old name in configs. > > - Starting from the Fedora 18 kernel oopses reporting will be > > configured to send reports unconditionally, straight to the > > kerneloops.org as it did the original tool. > > (this, hopefully, will fix the volume of the oopses we are getting.) > And probably the volume of complaints about spyware. It should be asking > permission even if "until further notice" is a choice. Absolutely. > For some environments this is a major issue. Consider people with ARM or > x86 prototype machines who are contractually forbidden from revealing a > lot of data about the systems. *nod* thanks! Anton. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
