"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ? > > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching... Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there are not a lot of program out there using it. > In some ways it's kind of sad. I found the /dev/shm interface to be > rather appealing :) I totally agree :( Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- swapfs for 2.4.1-pre J . A . Magallon
- [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM question (ramfs abuse) Christoph Rohland