"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
>
> On 02.02 Christoph Rohland wrote:
> > "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > What happened with this being a management tool for shared memory
> > > segments?!
> >
> > Unfortunately we lost this ability in the 2.4.0-test series. SYSV shm
> > now works only on an internal mounted instance and does not link the
> > directory entry to the deleted state of the segment.
> >
>
> Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ?
> One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching...
>
In some ways it's kind of sad. I found the /dev/shm interface to be
rather appealing :)
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
