Hi Guennadi, On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> > The latter one looks big because of a rename, but with "-M" it's pretty >> > trivial. Chris, do you agree? >> >> Is the minimal fix to just add "| IRQF_ONESHOT" to the request_threaded_irq >> argument? If so, I'd rather push just that for 3.5, and I can take care of >> having that change appear simultaneously in linux-next so that there aren't >> any conflicts. Is that okay with you? > > For that you'd have to rebase -next, right? you'd like to do that?
Yeah, I'm willing to rebase mmc-next for this -- I'd rather send the simplest possible fix this late in 3.5-rc, and the rebase is simple. Also, this fix is logically distinct from your rename patch. I don't think I need you to send anything more, I'll add the initial patch adding "| IRQF_ONESHOT", rebase your "extend and rename" patch on top of that, push both to mmc-next, and then send the initial patch to Linus in a few days. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
