Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink

[Hans Reiser]

Chris Mason wrote:
 
> Hans, decisions about proper compilers should not be made in each
> individual part of the kernel.  If unpatched gcc 2.96 is getting reiserfs

broke is broke.  If you use reiserfs, DO NOT use 2.96.  Period.  Nobody gains
by letting a single user make this mistake.  

> wrong, it is compiling other parts of the kernel wrong as well.  l-k has
> discussed this at length already ;-)

So, did Linus say no?  If not, let's ask him with a patch.  Quite simply,
neither we nor the users should be burdened with this, and the patch removes
the burden.

Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/