> : It is the original one. I'll try with the -69: > : > With 2.96-69 the reiserfs seems to work well. > Sorry for the confusion, I forgot to upgrade the gcc on my machine. Excellent. Im just glad to know its a fixed bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related) Jan Kasprzak
- Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic,... Hans Reiser
- Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determ... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, de... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.... Jan Kasprzak
- Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determinis... Alan Cox
- Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink Chris Mason
- Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, sym... Alan Cox
- Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, sym... Hans Reiser
- Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic... Alan Cox
- Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, determini... Hans Reiser
- Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deter... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserF... Hans Reiser
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserF... Alan Cox
- Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserF... Hans Reiser