On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > There's ongoing discussion about unifying ACPI and ftd representation, > and once that's done this isn't a problem, but right now there's no
Where is this discussion? > terribly straightforward way to do this without a lot of basically > boilerplate code. The biggest issue is that ACPI has a very different > idea about event delivery and we'd need some way to abstract that. Right, but there's lots of bolierplate code with this stuff anyway and it's not fundamentally hard. Last time I looked at ACPI it had a rather different model for how all this stuff would work than DT did which isn't terribly helpful here.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
