> > These are the same reasons the x86_64 people gave and regretted later. > > I would not compare the x86_64 extension to the AArch64 architecture.
It's not an architecture specific observation. I was just observing that you were following a pattern which in all other cases ended up with a merged tree. Now it could be your tree is different, it could be that the right approach in all these cases is actually to do a new tree and merge five years later - I don't know. It's your (aarch64 folks) project at the end of the day and you who have to keep all the fixes and errata and whatnot in sync between the two trees and I don't personally care too much which way it happens. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
