> Yes, but if SMP for Athlons is not supported, what is the point in > allowing CONFIG_SMP + CONFIG_MK7 (or CONFIG_SMP + CONFIG_MK6)? Such a > kernel will not run on *any* SMP system, since AMD kernels do not work > on Intel. If an AMD user really wants to carry around SMP baggage for > no reason, let him use CONFIG_M586TSC. Authors of drivers or other kernel add-on code often have to test their stuff on a variety of configurations. _Especially_ on an SMP kernel even if all they have is UP. Olaf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefined) David Ford
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefin... Stephen Frost
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' und... David Ford
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current'... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current'... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`curr... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Olaf Titz
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... David Lang
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (... Pavel Machek
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`curr... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Tom Leete