[Tom Leete] > No, I'm saying that SMP locking etc. is compatible with Athlon. The > failure to build is not a workaround but a coding error. SMP builds > for UP machines are supposed to work. Yes, but if SMP for Athlons is not supported, what is the point in allowing CONFIG_SMP + CONFIG_MK7 (or CONFIG_SMP + CONFIG_MK6)? Such a kernel will not run on *any* SMP system, since AMD kernels do not work on Intel. If an AMD user really wants to carry around SMP baggage for no reason, let him use CONFIG_M586TSC. This is like offering MCA-bus drivers for 'make config' on SPARC. Sure, they might compile, but nobody will have any use for them. Thus, we ensure that they never appear on the menus in the first place. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefined) David Ford
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' undefin... Stephen Frost
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current' und... David Ford
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current'... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`current'... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`curr... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Olaf Titz
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... David Lang
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (... Pavel Machek
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (`curr... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compile (... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to c... Tom Leete
- Re: 2.4.x and SMP fails to compi... Alan Cox