Roland McGrath wrote:: >> You mean the comment? > > No, that is trivial and already corrected. I mean the substance of your > most recent patch. I described why I think it is wrong. You did not respond.
I spent some time read you mail carefully and dig into the code again. And yes, you are right. It's possible that SA_ONSTACK has been cleared before the second signal on the same stack comes. So this patch is wrong :( . I will revise the other 4 patches. Sorry for the noise. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
