This change looks bogus to me. Before I get to the content, there is a nit that annoys me. You changed the punctuation in my comment so that it no longer means what it did, and now the comment is nonsensical. I don't demand decent English from hackers of any linguistic bent, but please don't louse up the coherent sentences I wrote when moving them down ten lines.
Please elaborate on the rationale that justifies this change. I don't see it at all. If you are already on the signal stack, it doesn't matter whether the signal that just arrived has SA_ONSTACK set or not. If you are going to overflow the stack with the new signal frame, we want to prevent that clobberation regardless. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
