Alan Cox wrote: > > better than i ever got with 2.4 even when only one drive was on a channel. > > Right now my k7-2 750 is at 849mhz with a FSB of 114Mhz and PCI at 34Mhz. > > Hint: people who overclock machines get suprising odd results and bad stuff > happens. Please dont waste developers time unless you can reproduce it at > the intended speed for the components Like i said .. i just did that within the last 5 min it has nothing to do with any problems i've been talking about - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David Raufeisen
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Mark Hahn
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David Riley
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David D.W. Downey
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Alan Cox
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Byron Stanoszek
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Byron Stanoszek
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Byron Stanoszek
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x safemode