>From what I gather this chipset on 2.4.x is only stable if you cripple just about >everything that makes > it worth having (udma, 2nd ide channel etc etc) ? does it even work when all >that's done now or is > it fully functional? it seems to be fully functional for some or most people, with two, apparently, reporting major problems. my via (kt133) is flawless in 2.4.1 (a drive on each channel, udma enabled and in use) and has for all the 2.3's since I got it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Nicholas Knight
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David D.W. Downey
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David Raufeisen
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David D.W. Downey
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David D.W. Downey
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x David Raufeisen
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.... safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with ... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption with ... Mark Hahn
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... David Riley
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... David D.W. Downey
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... Alan Cox
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... safemode
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: VT82C686A corruption w... safemode