> Do you mean that devices will not be able to indicate support of SG seperately > from hw checksum or that the IP zerocopy will simply ignore devices which > do not have both ? > > DECnet assumes that the mac level checksum will detect all errors and does > not have a checksum of its own on data, so it would only need SG to benefit > from the zerocopy framework, Ditto IPX - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Andrew Morton
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1... kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, agai... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... Steve Whitehouse
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... David S. Miller
- NBD Fix (attempt #2) Alan Cox
- NBD Fix (attempt #2) Steve Whitehouse
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, agai... kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... David S. Miller