Steve Whitehouse writes: > Do you mean that devices will not be able to indicate support of SG seperately > from hw checksum or that the IP zerocopy will simply ignore devices which > do not have both ? IP will ignore devices which do not have both. > DECnet assumes that the mac level checksum will detect all errors and does > not have a checksum of its own on data, so it would only need SG to benefit > from the zerocopy framework, Which is just fine. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Andrew Morton
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre... kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2... kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, agai... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... Steve Whitehouse
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... Alan Cox
- NBD Fix (attempt #2) Steve Whitehouse
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... kuznet
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patch... David S. Miller
- Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, ... kuznet