Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:41:44 +0100 Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> you may also want these:
>> ---
>> [bl]e_add_cpu conversion in return
> upsets powerpc (at least):
>
> fs/ufs/swab.h: In function `fs64_add':
> fs/ufs/swab.h:47: warning: passing arg 1 of `le64_add_cpu' from incompatible
> pointer type
> fs/ufs/swab.h:49: warning: passing arg 1 of `be64_add_cpu' from incompatible
> pointer type
> fs/ufs/swab.h: In function `fs64_sub':
> fs/ufs/swab.h:58: warning: passing arg 1 of `le64_add_cpu' from incompatible
> pointer type
> fs/ufs/swab.h:60: warning: passing arg 1 of `be64_add_cpu' from incompatible
> pointer type
sorry for this. Is it correct to cast like the patch below does?
If not (anyone) feel free to correct and send a patch yourself.
The patch below was *not* tested
---
[bl]e_add_cpu conversion in return (with cast)
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/fs/ufs/swab.h b/fs/ufs/swab.h
index 1683d2b..594d6e8 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/swab.h
+++ b/fs/ufs/swab.h
@@ -44,18 +44,22 @@ static __inline u32
fs64_add(struct super_block *sbp, u32 *n, int d)
{
if (UFS_SB(sbp)->s_bytesex == BYTESEX_LE)
- return *n = cpu_to_le64(le64_to_cpu(*n)+d);
+ le64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, d);
else
- return *n = cpu_to_be64(be64_to_cpu(*n)+d);
+ be64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, d);
+
+ return *n;
}
static __inline u32
fs64_sub(struct super_block *sbp, u32 *n, int d)
{
if (UFS_SB(sbp)->s_bytesex == BYTESEX_LE)
- return *n = cpu_to_le64(le64_to_cpu(*n)-d);
+ le64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, -d);
else
- return *n = cpu_to_be64(be64_to_cpu(*n)-d);
+ be64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, -d);
+
+ return *n;
}
static __inline u32
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
