> No. ECN is essential to the continued stability of the Internet. Without > probabilistic queuing (i.e. RED) and ECN the Internet will continue to have > retransmit synchronization and once congested stay congested until people get > frustrated and give it up for a little bit. Arguably so. In theory a vindictive probabilistic queueing is sufficient (do RED but then drop -every- frame from the same route as the packet chosen from the queue) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David S. Miller
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Andi Kleen
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) James Sutherland
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David Lang
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David S. Miller
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Michael H. Warfield
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Peter Samuelson
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Rogier Wolff
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Graham Murray
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Rogier Wolff
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- ECN fixes for Cisco gear Dax Kelson
- Re: ECN fixes for Cisco gear Lincoln Dale