On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:29:52PM +0000, James Sutherland wrote: > > There is nothing silly with the decision, davem is simply a modern day > > internet hero. > > No. If it were something essential, perhaps, but it's just a minor > performance tweak to cut packet loss over congested links. It's not > IPv6. It's not PMTU. It's not even very useful right now! No. ECN is essential to the continued stability of the Internet. Without probabilistic queuing (i.e. RED) and ECN the Internet will continue to have retransmit synchronization and once congested stay congested until people get frustrated and give it up for a little bit. It's a real issue, and it's actually important to have it implemented. It's not just a performance hack. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) James Sutherland
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David S. Miller
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Andi Kleen
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) James Sutherland
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David Lang
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David S. Miller
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Michael H. Warfield
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Peter Samuelson
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Rogier Wolff
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Graham Murray
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Rogier Wolff
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell