On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:09:40 +0800, Leon Hwang wrote: > 'onallcpus ? map_flags >> 32' does not look reasonable. > > Based on the 'if' above, either of these looks straightforward to me. > > int init_cpu = !onallcpus ? raw_smp_processor_id() : map_flags >> 32; > > or > > int init_cpu = (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) ? map_flags >> 32 : > raw_smp_processor_id();
Agreed, v3 takes the second. Thanks, Donggeun

