On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 8:06 AM Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Observed with two independent servers in the same process:
>
>   fd1 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>   setsockopt(fd1, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT, ...);
>   bind(fd1, port 0);          /* got 40000 */
>
>   fd2 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>   setsockopt(fd2, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT, ...);
>   bind(fd2, port 0);          /* got 40000 as well */
>
> Both sockets end up on the same port and join the same reuseport
> group, so each of them takes part of the other's datagrams. TCP does
> not do this.
>
> udp_lib_lport_inuse() keeps the reuseport rule when it scans for a
> free port: a socket with the same uid and SO_REUSEPORT set is not a
> conflict, so its port is never marked in the bitmap and the scan can
> hand it out again. That rule only makes sense when the user asks for
> a specific port.
>
> TCP fixed the same thing in commit 0643ee4fd1b7 ("inet: Fix get port
> to handle zero port number with soreuseport set"): reuseport is only
> honoured for an explicit port, not during a port scan.
>
> Do the same for UDP. Mark compatible reuseport sockets in the bitmap
> during a scan and only skip them when checking a specific port. Using
> bitmap to tell the two modes apart is not explicit, but
> udp_lib_lport_inuse() already does that for the port match itself.
>
> Note that this still collides when both sockets also have SO_REUSEADDR
> set: udp_lib_lport_inuse() skips such a pair before it reaches the
> reuseport check, so the port is never marked either. That is not a
> common setup and is left as is here.
>
> Fixes: ba418fa357a7 ("soreuseport: UDP/IPv4 implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/udp.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index b3887c42adfd..61cb1e3f5d93 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -147,11 +147,10 @@ static int udp_lib_lport_inuse(struct net *net, __u16 
> num,
>                     (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if ||
>                      sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
>                     inet_rcv_saddr_equal(sk, sk2, true)) {
> -                       if (sk2->sk_reuseport && sk->sk_reuseport &&
> +                       if (!bitmap && sk2->sk_reuseport && sk->sk_reuseport 
> &&
>                             !rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb) &&
>                             uid_eq(uid, sk_uid(sk2))) {
> -                               if (!bitmap)
> -                                       return 0;
> +                               return 0;
>                         } else {
>                                 if (!bitmap)
>                                         return 1;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

The fix is right and matches what TCP does in inet_csk_find_open_port(),
but it only covers one of the three cases where UDP's scan differs from TCP's.

On an unpatched kernel, binding 8 sockets to port 0 inside an 8-port
IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE:

udp SO_REUSEPORT 7 distinct ports, 9th bind succeeds udp SO_REUSEADDR
7 distinct ports,
9th bind succeeds udp REUSEADDR+REUSEPORT 6 distinct ports, 9th bind succeeds

(TCP gets 8 distinct and EADDRINUSE in all three.) Your patch only
fixes the first one;
the SO_REUSEADDR cases bail out of the conflict test before the reuseport check
so the bitmap is never marked. SO_REUSEADDR on its own is pretty common for UDP,
so I don't think we should leave it.

TCP handles all three because inet_csk_find_open_port() passes relax=false,
which disables both relaxations.

Please add a comment on top of the loop saying that @bitmap means "scanning",
since it is not obvious — or use !num, which is equivalent here since
udp_lib_get_port()
passes snum == 0 on the scan path.

Please also extend patch 2 to cover SO_REUSEADDR and SO_REUSEADDR|SO_REUSEPORT;
the helper refactor is already there, just make the bool a flags argument.

Given this is a 13 year old bind() behaviour change and the collision
window is tiny
with the default ephemeral range, net-next seems like the better target.

Perhaps a good candidate for "Cc: [email protected] # lets
not break applications..."



diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index bb8cfc62cb00431faefd0371a9de9346b9bb..8628b723ec946eed6337209f62f683ba4252
100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -143,21 +143,18 @@ static int udp_lib_lport_inuse(struct net *net, __u16 num,
                if (net_eq(sock_net(sk2), net) &&
                    sk2 != sk &&
                    (bitmap || udp_sk(sk2)->udp_port_hash == num) &&
-                   (!sk2->sk_reuse || !sk->sk_reuse) &&
+                   (bitmap || !sk2->sk_reuse || !sk->sk_reuse) &&
                    (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if ||
                     sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
                    inet_rcv_saddr_equal(sk, sk2, true)) {
-                       if (sk2->sk_reuseport && sk->sk_reuseport &&
-                           !rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb) &&
-                           uid_eq(uid, sk_uid(sk2))) {
-                               if (!bitmap)
+                       if (!bitmap) {
+                               if (sk2->sk_reuseport && sk->sk_reuseport &&
+                                   !rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb) &&
+                                   uid_eq(uid, sk_uid(sk2)))
                                        return 0;
-                       } else {
-                               if (!bitmap)
-                                       return 1;
-                               __set_bit(udp_sk(sk2)->udp_port_hash >> log,
-                                         bitmap);
+                               return 1;
                        }
+                       __set_bit(udp_sk(sk2)->udp_port_hash >> log, bitmap);
                }
        }
        return 0;

Reply via email to