Add the JIT support required for BPF exceptions on riscv64.

Two kinds of programs need special prologue/epilogue handling:

  - A program acting as an exception boundary must save the full set of
    riscv callee-saved GP registers (ra, s0-s11), not just the ones it
    clobbers, so that the exception callback can restore the
    state that was live at the boundary. ra and fp are stored first so
    the saved ra/fp pair forms a valid stackframe record for the
    unwinder.

  - exception_cb does not allocate its own frame. It reuses the boundary
    program's frame, whose frame pointer is passed in a2, by setting
    SP = FP - stack_adjust. This lines the epilogue's loads up with
    the registers the boundary saved, so both paths restore the same
    order.

Both cases are implemented as prologue/epilogue helpers next to the
normal-path ones, selected with a plain if/else in
bpf_jit_build_prologue() and __build_epilogue().

Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <[email protected]>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index b804382075c4..e0c2f73bc646 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -56,6 +56,29 @@ static const int pt_regmap[] = {
        [RV_REG_T0] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, t0),
 };
 
+/* Full set of RISC-V callee-saved GP registers (ra, s0-s11) saved by a program
+ * acting as an exception boundary, in the order they are stored on the stack.
+ * RA and FP come first so the saved ra/fp pair forms a valid stackframe record
+ * at [FP-8]/[FP-16] for the unwinder. The exception callback reuses the
+ * boundary program's frame and restores this same set in its epilogue, so both
+ * paths must agree on the contents and ordering of this list.
+ */
+static const int rv_exception_csave_regs[] = {
+       RV_REG_RA,
+       RV_REG_FP,
+       RV_REG_S1,
+       RV_REG_S2,
+       RV_REG_S3,
+       RV_REG_S4,
+       RV_REG_S5,
+       RV_REG_S6,
+       RV_REG_S7,
+       RV_REG_S8,
+       RV_REG_S9,
+       RV_REG_S10,
+       RV_REG_S11,
+};
+
 enum {
        RV_CTX_F_SEEN_CALL =            RV_REG_RA,
        RV_CTX_F_SEEN_S1 =              RV_REG_S1,
@@ -312,11 +335,67 @@ static void emit_normal_restore(struct rv_jit_context 
*ctx, int stack_adjust)
        emit_ld(RV_REG_TCC, ctx->tcc_offset, RV_REG_SP, ctx);
 }
 
+static bool is_exception_prog(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+       return prog->aux->exception_boundary || prog->aux->exception_cb;
+}
+
+static void emit_exception_boundary_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
+                                            int stack_adjust)
+{
+       int store_offset = stack_adjust - 8;
+       int i;
+
+       emit_addi(RV_REG_SP, RV_REG_SP, -stack_adjust, ctx);
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rv_exception_csave_regs); i++) {
+               emit_sd(RV_REG_SP, store_offset, rv_exception_csave_regs[i], 
ctx);
+               store_offset -= 8;
+       }
+
+       /* store TCC from RV_REG_TCC to stack */
+       emit_sd(RV_REG_SP, store_offset, RV_REG_TCC, ctx);
+       ctx->tcc_offset = store_offset;
+
+       emit_addi(RV_REG_FP, RV_REG_SP, stack_adjust, ctx);
+}
+
+/* reuses the boundary program's frame, whose frame pointer
+ * is passed in a2 (since it's the third argument from bpf_throw()).
+ * Setting SP = FP - stack_adjust lines the epilogue's loads up with
+ * the registers the boundary saved.
+ */
+static void emit_exception_cb_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
+                                      int stack_adjust)
+{
+       emit_mv(RV_REG_FP, RV_REG_A2, ctx);
+       emit_addi(RV_REG_SP, RV_REG_FP, -stack_adjust, ctx);
+       ctx->tcc_offset = stack_adjust - 8 - 
ARRAY_SIZE(rv_exception_csave_regs) * 8;
+}
+
+/* Used by both the boundary program and the exception callback alike, since 
the
+ * callback runs on the boundary's frame.
+ */
+static void emit_exception_restore(struct rv_jit_context *ctx, int 
stack_adjust)
+{
+       int store_offset = stack_adjust - 8;
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rv_exception_csave_regs); i++) {
+               emit_ld(rv_exception_csave_regs[i], store_offset, RV_REG_SP, 
ctx);
+               store_offset -= 8;
+       }
+       /* restore TCC from stack to RV_REG_TCC */
+       emit_ld(RV_REG_TCC, ctx->tcc_offset, RV_REG_SP, ctx);
+}
+
 static void __build_epilogue(bool is_tail_call, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
        int stack_adjust = ctx->stack_size;
 
-       emit_normal_restore(ctx, stack_adjust);
+       if (is_exception_prog(ctx->prog))
+               emit_exception_restore(ctx, stack_adjust);
+       else
+               emit_normal_restore(ctx, stack_adjust);
 
        emit_addi(RV_REG_SP, RV_REG_SP, stack_adjust, ctx);
        /* Set return value. */
@@ -2086,6 +2165,15 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, 
struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
        return 0;
 }
 
+static int exception_stack_adjust(void)
+{
+       int stack_adjust = 0;
+
+       stack_adjust += 8; /* RV_REG_TCC */
+       stack_adjust += ARRAY_SIZE(rv_exception_csave_regs) * 8;
+       return round_up(stack_adjust, STACK_ALIGN);
+}
+
 void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx, bool is_subprog)
 {
        int i, stack_adjust, bpf_stack_adjust;
@@ -2106,8 +2194,17 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx, 
bool is_subprog)
        if (!is_subprog)
                emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_ZERO, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT), ctx);
 
-       stack_adjust = normal_stack_adjust(ctx) + bpf_stack_adjust;
-       emit_normal_prologue(ctx, stack_adjust);
+       if (is_exception_prog(ctx->prog)) {
+               stack_adjust = exception_stack_adjust() + bpf_stack_adjust;
+
+               if (ctx->prog->aux->exception_cb)
+                       emit_exception_cb_prologue(ctx, stack_adjust);
+               else
+                       emit_exception_boundary_prologue(ctx, stack_adjust);
+       } else {
+               stack_adjust = normal_stack_adjust(ctx) + bpf_stack_adjust;
+               emit_normal_prologue(ctx, stack_adjust);
+       }
 
        if (bpf_stack_adjust)
                emit_addi(RV_REG_S5, RV_REG_SP, bpf_stack_adjust, ctx);
@@ -2183,3 +2280,12 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void)
 {
        return true;
 }
+
+bool bpf_jit_supports_exceptions(void)
+{
+       /* bpf_throw() unwinds by walking the frame-pointer chain from inside
+        * the kernel back into the BPF frames (see arch_bpf_stack_walk()), so
+        * exceptions require the frame-pointer unwinder to be enabled.
+        */
+       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER);
+}
-- 
2.55.0


Reply via email to