Hi
Am 20.07.26 um 17:15 schrieb Diogo Silva:
Hey,
Again, you rather want drm_err() with drm_dev here.
I've briefly looked over the series and many patches seem affected.
Please prefer drm_ logging functions and DRM devices over the plain
device equivalents.
Thanks. I will submit a v2 with consistent usage of drm_err().
Thanks
Also, is there any ongoing task or would it be useful to submit patches
changing the usage of DRM_DEV_* functions with drm_* equivalents?
Or from dev_* to drm_* when possible ?
Possibly. DRM_DEV_ logging is supposed to be replaced with drm_ logging
helpers. That would be a simple follow-up series. Whether to prefer
drm_ over dev_ logging depends on the context and the driver maintainer.
Best regards
Thomas
BR,
Diogo
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany, www.suse.com
GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
