Hey, > Again, you rather want drm_err() with drm_dev here. > > I've briefly looked over the series and many patches seem affected. > Please prefer drm_ logging functions and DRM devices over the plain > device equivalents.
Thanks. I will submit a v2 with consistent usage of drm_err(). Also, is there any ongoing task or would it be useful to submit patches changing the usage of DRM_DEV_* functions with drm_* equivalents? Or from dev_* to drm_* when possible ? BR, Diogo
