Add a selftest that verifies the kernel re-evaluates a seccomp filter
with the correct (ptrace-modified) first argument after
a SECCOMP_RET_TRACE stop. On arm64, syscall_get_arguments() reads
the first argument from orig_x0, which may be stale if the tracer modified
regs->regs[0] but orig_x0 was not synced.  This can cause the filter to
see an old argument and incorrectly allow a syscall that it should
have rejected.

The child installs a filter that:
 - TRACEs write() when fd == 2
 - returns ERRNO(EPERM) when fd == 1

The parent catches the SECCOMP event, changes x0 (fd) from 2 to 1,
and resumes the child.

If the seccomp re-evaluation sees the stale orig_x0 (fd=2) the filter
returns TRACE again and the kernel (with recheck_after_trace=true)
allows the syscall to proceed – write succeeds and the child exits 0.
If the seccomp re-evaluation sees the new value (fd=1) the filter
returns ERRNO(EPERM), write fails and the child exits non-zero.
The test passes only when the write fails (child exit != 0).

Before the fix:
        # ./seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass
        TAP version 13
        1..1
        not ok 1 write succeeded, orig_x0 bypass likely
        # Totals: pass:0 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

After the fix:
        # ./seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass
        TAP version 13
        1..1
        ok 1 seccomp correctly denied modified syscall
        # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202607152004.DEA95D63@keescook/
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore  |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile    |   2 +-
 .../arm64/abi/seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass.c   | 196 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore 
b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore
index 39129a9907c7..491a80db9dff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 hwcap
 ptrace
 seccomp_ptrace_x0_bypass
+seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass
 syscall-abi
 tpidr2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile 
b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile
index 5a16db379bd4..a01d3806eba8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 # Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
 
-TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwcap ptrace syscall-abi tpidr2 seccomp_ptrace_x0_bypass
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwcap ptrace syscall-abi tpidr2 seccomp_ptrace_x0_bypass 
seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass
 
 include ../../lib.mk
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6887ec71aef1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/seccomp_ret_trace_x0_bypass.c
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Test for SECCOMP_RET_TRACE argument modification bypass
+ * via stale orig_x0 during filter re-evaluation.
+ *
+ * On arm64, syscall_get_arguments() reads the first argument from
+ * regs->orig_x0.  When a seccomp filter returns SECCOMP_RET_TRACE,
+ * ptrace may modify regs->regs[0] while orig_x0 remains unchanged.
+ * The kernel then re-evaluates the filter; if it sees the stale
+ * orig_x0, it may incorrectly allow a syscall that the tracer intended
+ * to block.
+ *
+ * This test installs a filter that:
+ *   - TRACEs write() when fd == 2
+ *   - returns ERRNO(EPERM) when fd == 1
+ *   - allows all other syscalls
+ *
+ * The child calls write(2, ...).  The parent catches the SECCOMP stop,
+ * changes x0 (fd) from 2 to 1, and resumes the child.
+ *
+ * If re-evaluation sees the old fd=2 (stale orig_x0), the filter
+ * returns TRACE again; because recheck_after_trace is true, the kernel
+ * allows the syscall to proceed.  write(1, ...) succeeds, child exits 0.
+ * -> test FAIL (bypass detected).
+ *
+ * If re-evaluation sees the new fd=1 (synced orig_x0), the filter
+ * returns ERRNO(EPERM), write fails, child exits 1.
+ * -> test PASS (no bypass).
+ *
+ * No special privileges required beyond CAP_SYS_PTRACE.
+ */
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <sys/ptrace.h>
+#include <sys/uio.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <linux/elf.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/seccomp.h>
+#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+
+#include "kselftest.h"
+
+#ifndef __NR_write
+#define __NR_write 64
+#endif
+
+#define PTRACE_EVENT_MASK(status) ((status) >> 16)
+
+static int do_child(void)
+{
+       long ret;
+
+       if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL))
+               _exit(2);
+
+       raise(SIGSTOP); /* synchronize with parent */
+
+       /*
+        * Filter:
+        *   if syscall == write:
+        *     if fd == 2 -> TRACE
+        *     if fd == 1 -> ERRNO(EPERM)
+        *     else -> ALLOW
+        *   else -> ALLOW
+        */
+       struct sock_filter filter[] = {
+               /* Load syscall number */
+               BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS,
+                        offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
+               /* If not write, allow */
+               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, __NR_write, 0, 5),
+               /* Load first argument (fd) */
+               BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS,
+                        offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[0])),
+               /* fd == 2 ? */
+               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, 2, 0, 2),
+               /* Yes: TRACE */
+               BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_TRACE),
+               /* fd == 1 ? */
+               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K, 1, 0, 1),
+               /* Yes: ERRNO(EPERM) */
+               BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO | (EPERM & 
SECCOMP_RET_DATA)),
+               /* Other fd: ALLOW */
+               BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
+       };
+
+       struct sock_fprog prog = {
+               .len = ARRAY_SIZE(filter),
+               .filter = filter,
+       };
+
+       if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0))
+               _exit(3);
+       if (prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog))
+               _exit(4);
+
+       /*
+        * write(2, ...) triggers TRACE, parent changes fd to 1.
+        * If re-eval sees fd=1 -> ERRNO -> write fails, ret = -EPERM.
+        * If re-eval sees fd=2 -> TRACE again -> allowed -> write succeeds.
+        */
+       ret = syscall(__NR_write, 2, "", 0);
+       _exit(ret == 0 ? 0 : 1);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+       struct user_pt_regs regs;
+       struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = &regs, .iov_len = sizeof(regs) };
+       pid_t child;
+       int status;
+
+       ksft_print_header();
+       ksft_set_plan(1);
+
+       child = fork();
+       if (!child)
+               return do_child();
+
+       /* 1. Wait for initial SIGSTOP */
+       if (waitpid(child, &status, 0) != child)
+               ksft_exit_fail_msg("waitpid SIGSTOP");
+       if (!WIFSTOPPED(status) || WSTOPSIG(status) != SIGSTOP)
+               ksft_exit_fail_msg("unexpected initial stop");
+
+       /* 2. Enable SECCOMP ptrace events */
+       if (ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, child, 0, PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP))
+               ksft_exit_fail_msg("PTRACE_SETOPTIONS");
+
+       /* 3. Continue child to hit SECCOMP stop */
+       if (ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0))
+               ksft_exit_fail_msg("PTRACE_CONT");
+
+       /* 4. Wait for SECCOMP stop */
+       while (1) {
+               if (waitpid(child, &status, 0) != child)
+                       ksft_exit_fail_msg("waitpid SECCOMP");
+               if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
+                       ksft_test_result_fail("child exited before SECCOMP 
stop\n");
+                       goto out;
+               }
+               if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
+                       ksft_test_result_fail("child killed unexpectedly\n");
+                       goto out;
+               }
+               if (WIFSTOPPED(status) &&
+                   WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP &&
+                   PTRACE_EVENT_MASK(status) == PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)
+                       break;
+               ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, WSTOPSIG(status));
+       }
+
+       /* 5. Modify x0 (fd) from 2 to 1 */
+       if (ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, NT_PRSTATUS, &iov))
+               ksft_exit_fail_perror("GETREGSET");
+       if (regs.regs[8] != __NR_write || regs.regs[0] != 2) {
+               ksft_test_result_fail("unexpected regs: syscall=%llu, 
x0=%llu\n",
+                                     regs.regs[8], regs.regs[0]);
+               goto out;
+       }
+       regs.regs[0] = 1;
+       if (ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, child, NT_PRSTATUS, &iov))
+               ksft_exit_fail_perror("SETREGSET");
+
+       /* 6. Resume child */
+       if (ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0))
+               ksft_exit_fail_perror("PTRACE_CONT");
+
+       /* 7. Reap child – must exit normally */
+       if (waitpid(child, &status, 0) != child)
+               ksft_exit_fail_msg("final waitpid");
+
+       if (!WIFEXITED(status)) {
+               ksft_test_result_fail("child did not exit normally\n");
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       if (WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0)
+               ksft_test_result_pass("seccomp correctly denied modified 
syscall\n");
+       else
+               ksft_test_result_fail("write succeeded, orig_x0 bypass 
likely\n");
+
+out:
+       if (child > 0) {
+               kill(child, SIGKILL);
+               waitpid(child, NULL, 0);
+       }
+       ksft_print_cnts();
+       return ksft_get_fail_cnt() ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
+}
-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to