Some reason my scripting missed rcu list for these last 2 patches. But they are on the lkml list :) sorry.
Adding back rcu@. On 7/18/2026 1:15 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > scf_torture_stats_print() aggregates each invoker thread's counters > into a local scf_statistics structure before printing, but the > n_single_rpc_ofl field is missing from the aggregation loop. As a > result, the "single_rpc_ofl" value printed in the statistics line is > always zero, even when smp_call_function_single() invocations for the > RPC test have failed due to offline CPUs and been counted by the > invoker threads. > > Add the missing accumulation so that the printed value reflects the > actual counts. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> > --- > kernel/scftorture.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/scftorture.c b/kernel/scftorture.c > index 327c315f411c..ffd6c83732ee 100644 > --- a/kernel/scftorture.c > +++ b/kernel/scftorture.c > @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void scf_torture_stats_print(void) > scfs.n_single += scf_stats_p[i].n_single; > scfs.n_single_ofl += scf_stats_p[i].n_single_ofl; > scfs.n_single_rpc += scf_stats_p[i].n_single_rpc; > + scfs.n_single_rpc_ofl += scf_stats_p[i].n_single_rpc_ofl; > scfs.n_single_wait += scf_stats_p[i].n_single_wait; > scfs.n_single_wait_ofl += scf_stats_p[i].n_single_wait_ofl; > scfs.n_many += scf_stats_p[i].n_many;
