> James Bottomley wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:23 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote: > >> duplicate pa11_dma_alloc_consistent; more appropriate appears > >> pa11_dma_alloc_noncoherent here. > >> > >> Not tested, please confirm that this fix is correct > > > > No, it looks completely incorrect to me. What makes you think a pcxl > > box has a problem with coherency? > > Ok, please ignore the patch then. It just appeared suspicious to me > that the function did exist, but the names assigned were different.
How about a comment? Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
