On 7/3/26 7:48 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Mohammad Shahid <[email protected]>
>
> vfree() safely handles NULL pointers, so the explicit NULL check
> before calling vfree() is unnecessary.
>
> This issue was reported by ifnullfree.cocci.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Shahid <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> index f87e9f251d13..009fe107b0d7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> @@ -1644,8 +1644,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t
> size, dma_addr_t *dma,
> err:
> if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
> gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
> - if (buf)
> - vfree(buf);
> + vfree(buf);
> kfree(nfit_res);
> return NULL;
> }
