On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 11:00:07AM -0700, Björn Töpel wrote: > Varun R Mallya <[email protected]> writes: > > > This patch removes BPF exceptions from riscv64 denylist on > > BPF selftests since support for exceptions has been added now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <[email protected]> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 > > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 > > index 4fc4dfdde293..9268351ce4c1 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.riscv64 > > @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ > > # riscv64 deny list for BPF CI and local vmtest > > -exceptions # JIT does not support > > exceptions > > Hmm, reading your cover the kselftest run still says "#113 > exceptions:FAIL", so from a CI perspective this is not much help. ;-) > Can we restructure/split so that we're not bitten by the lack of > BPF-to-BPF calls and tail calls?
Yeah, that was pretty foolish of me. My next version won't include a denylist change, but if [1] lands, then we won't have to worry about this anymore! [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] > > Thanks, > Björn
